H.265 and MJPEG are two different video compression formats. Published by the best free file converter – MiniTool Video Converter, this article will delineate the information about MJPEG and H.265. Meanwhile, it will conduct a detailed comparison focusing on MJPEG vs H.265 to help you make a better choice between them.
Before the comparison focusing on MJPEG vs H.265, let’s understand MJPEG and H.265 first.
Understanding MJPEG
In the following paragraphs, you will learn various aspects of MJPEG.
What Is MJPEG
Standing for Motion JPEG, MJPEG functions as a video compression format. Created by the Joint Photographic Experts Group, it was developed on the basis of the JPEG image compression format. Different from H.265 and H.264, MJPEG is capable of compressing every video frame as an independent JPEG image.
The Pros and Cons of MJPEG
To help you know better about MJPEG vs H.265, the pros and cons of MJPEG are listed below.
Pros:
- It has a simple decoding scheme, leading to a lower requirement for computing resources.
- Its absence of inter-frame dependencies results in lower latency in the process of video streaming.
- It allows extracting each frame with high quality and can be an ideal choice for precise analysis.
- It stresses the independence of each frame, which lowers the vulnerability brought by transmission errors or data corruption.
Cons:
- It often leads to a large file size, causing a higher requirement for the storage space of your PC.
- It lacks inter-frame compression and thus has lower compression efficiency.
Understanding H.265
After reading this section, you will have a good command of H.265.
What Is H.265
Standing for High Efficiency Video Coding, H.265 refers to a video compression format. More advanced than H.264, it is also known as HEVC. By a variety of coding techniques like entropy coding, enhanced motion compensation, and improved prediction algorithms, H.265 enables high compression efficiency.
The Advantages and Disadvantages of H.265
For a better comparison of MJPEG vs H.265, the advantages and disadvantages of H.265 are written here.
Advantages:
- It empowers users to enjoy high-quality video content at lower bit rates.
- It is compatible with high resolutions, such as 4K and 8K.
- It provides users with numerous encoding options
Disadvantages:
- It is incompatible with less-capable or older hardware devices.
- It may bring interoperability issues on some devices and systems.
An In-Depth Comparison Between MJPEG and H.265
From 3 aspects, an ultimate comparison of H.265 vs MJPEG will be conducted in the following content.
Aspect 1 of MJPEG vs H.265: Video Quality and Resolution Support
Video quality is an influential factor that encourages you to choose a preferable video compression format. H.265 can give you better video quality than H.264 does. However, if the video quality brought by H.265 can’t suit your needs, MJPEG can be a better choice for you.
On the other hand, if you stress the importance of resolution, MJPEG gives support for 4K and 8K. In contrast, H.265 supports 8K and beyond. Please make a choice between the two according to your needs.
Aspect 2 of MJPEG vs H.265: Storage Requirement and Compatibility
Storage requirement is another factor that urges you to choose between MJPEG and H.265. As mentioned above, MJPEG has lower compression efficiency, which triggers a larger file size and puts a higher requirement for storage space. In contrast, H.265, which has higher compression efficiency, can help you save more storage space. Therefore, if the storage space of your PC is limited, H.265 can be a better choice for you.
Better compatibility means that you can play and share your videos on more platforms and devices. In this background, the compatibility of MJPEG is fairly limited, which brings more obstacles to your video playing. Luckily, H.265 has better performance in compatibility.
MiniTool Video ConverterClick to Download100%Clean & Safe
Aspect 3 of MJPEG vs H.265: Real-Time Support
The fields that your videos are used for also influence your choice. Taking MJPEG as an example, it often brings users a high-latency visual experience, denoting that MJPEG is not a good option for real-time use. In contrast, H.265, which causes lower latency, is a better choice for your real-time use.
Bottom Line
Focusing on MJPEG vs H.265, this article walks you through MJPEG and H.265. At the same time, it conducts a comprehensive comparison, which helps you to make a better choice based on your needs.
About The Author
Position: Columnist
Eien, who was majored in English at the university, has been an editor of MiniTool now. In his opinion, the software developed by MiniTool has brought great convenience to people, which also urges him to share more articles about the software with readers. In his daily life, Eien has a passion for singing and listening to music.